The Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald: Matter of Money, Class and Economics Essay

Es s bunghole Topic:\n\nM unityy, fork and economic riddles as the study issues revealed in The smashing Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat be the briny economical issues revealed in Scott Fitzgerald The large Gatsby? What does mean the Ameri after part stargaze mean in name of the apologue? Why is coin so essential for the fables partings?\n\nThesis disputation:\n\nActu on the squ be(prenominal)y, it wont be mistakable to say that economical means or gene of notes is one of the intimately fundamental in The Great Gatsby and it makes wholly things go around this thing.\n\n \nThe Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald: Matter of Money, crime syndicate and Economics Essay\n\n \n\n universe: Scott Fitzgerald is one of the around salient Ameri gage writers of the end of nineteenth and the beginning of 20th cc. His blend in may be viewed as the reflection of his time and the novel The Great Gatsby is, probably, the best grammatical case that jake s prove this statement. It was pen at that period of Ameri nominate history when tidy sum worry the most round their successfulness and richness though one may say that such determine were typical for Americans, it was, and by the way still is, so called American dream. also it was time when race pull in a lot of currency culpablely using diametric means to break the laws that existed in the USA and one of the most popular business was bootleg ca occasiond by prohibition of alcoholic beverage in the whole country. That is whitherfore in the novel we can find people who realise currency in this illegal and dishonest way. So the problem of making notes and the military set up of public to it is kind of seeming(a) here exclusively to a heavy(p)er extent fundamental is the problem of mold of money, br otherly role on peoples action, conduct and character. Actually, it wont be mistakable to say that economical detailor or incidentor of money is one of the mo st consequential in The Great Gatsby and it makes all things go around this thing. But, at the same time, though the problem of money and its influence on a person is the straits plainly not the just now one in the novel.\n\nWe can also speak substantially-nigh a very modify traffic in an American family of those days, slightly different affairs that smashed such a family, and, to some extent, we come here a revolutionary physical process which takes place in the whole society when moral determine restrain begun to change. On study this novel we learn how hard the American society is adulterate by money and by peoples inclination to be rich. That is what Scott Fitzgerald describes in his great novel. As I amaze already said the briny theme of The Great Gatsby is the pervert power which money has everywhere a person and which destroy an innocent temperament. The writer tells us how the wealthiness can dash a pure dream. In aver to prove it we can drop a pan orama at the relations and action stories of Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan Jordan baker, Meyer Wolfsheim and other characters. Analyzing these characters we see the single-valued function which play money and social position in their lives. For example, Daisy doesnt have both employment in the sustenance the precisely(prenominal) thing she deals about is wealth. She matrimonial a rich world whom she didnt really hunch forward, and later on she preferred to stay with him b atomic number 18ly not with Gatsby. I theorise we have to pay up a special attention to the relations mingled with Daisy and Gatsby because they demonstrate quite opposite attitude to people and to life in general. So for Gatsby his love to this woman is the most valuable thing in his life while for Daisy he is a toy, an entertainment, one much than love affair. That is why her election proves that wealthy social position of her husband is more important for her than real and serious feelings of other man. She doesnt have all moral values. Even her daughter doesnt provoke some(prenominal) noticeable feelings in her soul. Actually, her love affairs with Gatsby were caused mainly by her boring way of life, because she ingest some vernal impressions, new feelings. In general, it is evident that Daisy doesnt billing about other peoples feelings and sufferings. may be she doesnt care about human life itself because when she kills Myrtle Wilson, she doesnt eventide stop (Bruccoli, Andrew J., ed. New Essays on The Great Gatsby). The same situations we observe when Gatsby is killed. So if she has any orient in her plain life it may be only entertainment or fishy herself.\n\nAs for tom turkey his life seems to be even worse than the life of his married woman though they are alike in a way. Like Daisy turkey cock doesnt have any purpose in the life. He looks only for new strong feelings and cares only about his earnings. He needs money, it is his God. He is positive(pr edicate) that money can create him everything he wants and this attitude to the wealth is usual for people of his type. tomcat plays with other people. He has a mistress Myrtle and he demands a total deference from her side. It shows us that she means zipper for him as well as his own wife. To prove it we need to remember that though he became furious when he guessed about c unload relations between Gatsby and Daisy tho, at the same time, he didnt do anything to supporter his wife when she killed Myrtle. I think it would be more rude(a) for a husband who loves his wife to act as Gatsby did but Tom demonstrated his composure to Daisys fate. And one more thing that I cant ignore is the fact that he uses his wealth as the mean to keep Daisy as his wife. So it is obvious that for him people mean nothing and he is a slave of money. a lot the same we can say about less important characters of the novel. Dan Cody makes fortune in his grunter mining business but his life is a mess . Jordan Baker is a champion golfer but she doesnt have any moral values as well as Meyer Wolfsheim who is a racketeer, bootlegger and a gambler.\n\nThe only person in the novel who is not profane by his money is, to my mind, Gatsby. He earned his fortune, he contact himself by expensive cars, he wears exclusive clothes and lives in a mansion but in reality he doesnt need all these things because he wants to return Daisy. He is sure that only a serious social position and a lot of money can help him brighten his intentions. That is why he believes that his possessions impart convince his golden female child to for receive the past five years of her life and follow him. When he takes Daisy into his house and shows her his belongings, he values each accompaniment according to the worth that she places on it. When she shatters his dream by judge Tom over him, Gatsby has no need for any of his possessions.(Lee Brian, American Fiction 1865-1940). Now on the house, the clothes, a nd the cars mean nothing for him. So any reader can realize as break away did that Gatsby is the most positive character among his surrounding and the least weakened by his wealth.\n\nConclusion: Finally, I can conclude that all rich characters of the novel use people as toys. Tom uses Myrtle as well as her husband George Wilson. Gatsby uses the butlers and the cooks to create his parties and we may continue the list. a lot all of the characters are vitiate by their wealth and they are immoral people. Scott Fitzgerald clearly shows us how a wonderful American dream is destroyed by the peoples swear to earn more and more. This need makes people forget that they are human beings. They forget about moral values and lose their human face. That is why we have to remember that money and spunky social position are dangerous things they cannot be the let of life because they kill personality and it is very important to pay special attention to this fact while reading the novel. Thi s is a great lesson that we can learn from The Great Gatsby.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!