Critical Analysis of Darkness at Noon by Harold Krents Essay -- Darkne

Critical Analysis of Darkness at Noon by Harold Krents In Darkness at Noon, Harold Krents vividly describes some of the everyday prejudices disabled citizens must face. Presented in an a great deal humorous fashion, the author opens the readers eyes to the cruel ironies of societys gestate and inaccurate judgments, and their long reaching effects on his life. Krents begins his essay by pointing out to the reader that he idler non see himself, and thus, often has to depend upon the viewpoints of others. He states To ensure it has not been narcissistic. The average reader may not be aware that the word narcissistic means, Excessively in love with oneself. It is helpful for the reader to bread and butter this first observation in mind as he continues through the article, and hears Krents descriptions of societys viewpoints. Krents points out three particular judgments that are often passed on him by the public. There are those who assume that since I cant see, I obviously c annot hear then, others know that of course I can hear, but believe that I cant talk and finally The toughest misconception of all is the view that because I cant see, I cant work. It is surely an unfortunate irony, that the disabled citizen must not only deal with his own burdens, but also, the imaginary ones placed upon him by society. Krents supports his statements using appealing informative stories with effective imagery. Krents chooses to use words which are effective, and relay a definite scene to the reader. Some examples are enunciating each word very cautiously, ..if the dread word is spoken, the ticket agents retina will immediately detachand my saint-like disposition deserted meI finally blurted out He creates i... ...is not even present. Krents other recollections are also effective. They all work together to demonstrate the unfounded fears and misconceptions of some members of society. Krents mistake is attributing the opinions of a misled a few(prenominal) to those of the entire nation. Although the reader is moved by Krents many stories and examples, the lack of objectivity in the essay leaves the reader with doubts. Krents theme - that if handicapped persons were viewed fairly their impediment would be not be apparent- is one that the reader is aware of and wants to believe in. Yet, Krents own pessimistic tones overshadow the greater good. The reader is left with the brackish tactual sensationing that this essay may be nothing more than a very unconfident and dissatisfied man, attempting to pin his disappointments and failures on society, so that he may feel better about himself.